Has anyone tried Deepseek V3? Does it work?

Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:44

Has anyone tried Deepseek V3? Does it work?

I’ve just tried Deepseek V3 just so I could answer your question.

It breaks down an instruction (or multiple instructions) as a chain-of-thought reasoning (or multiple micro steps) as it shows you its thinking process.

So it’s a lot of copy and pasting when it comes to testing code on a separate website.

The Switch 2’s promising start hides an uncertain future - The Verge

Plus, there’s no way to opt-out of using your data for training purposes, which is a huge issue (for the website version that is).

To answer your question, it definitely does work as an LLM.

Though it’s hard to say about coding since it doesn’t have a feature like Claude Artifacts, where a separate window is created to see how the code looks as an output.

Astronomers thought the Milky Way was doomed to crash into Andromeda. Now they’re not so sure - The Conversation

At first glance, it seems like a barebones version of GPT 4o or Microsoft Copilot, where you can upload documents or images (up to 50, text extraction only).

But I find what makes it stand out from other LLMs is the Deepthinking feature.

So my recommendation is to run Deepseek V3 locally (requires extremely expensive hardware).

What do you think about the NFA full auto band? Weapons built before 1986 can be transferred and registered? But we can't have an 87? But older weapons tend to be far more powerful. I think we should drop it. Input?